Showing posts with label Edited Collections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Edited Collections. Show all posts

Thursday, July 16, 2026

CFP Between Screens: Video Games, Film, Television and Transmedia Exchange (8/7/2026)

Of potential interest:

Between Screens: Video Games, Film, Television and Transmedia Exchange


deadline for submissions:
August 7, 2026

full name / name of organization:
Dr Michael Samuel (University of Bristol) and Dr Richard Cole (University of Bristol)

contact email:
mike.samuel@bristol.ac.uk

source: https://call-for-papers.sas.upenn.edu/cfp/2026/06/25/between-screens-video-games-film-television-and-transmedia-exchange


Between Screens: Video Games, Film, Television and Transmedia Exchange

Edited by Dr Michael Samuel and Dr Richard Cole

Adaptation is a dialogic process, a creative exchange across content production and context rather than an attempt at fidelity. Recent trends in adaptation studies reflect this complexity. Videogames exist within a vast ecosystem of transmedia storytelling and experiences, yet scholarship on adaptation and video games remains limited.

This collection is a response to this gap. Our aim with Between Screens is to reframe the conversation about the relationship between videogames and other screen media, inviting approaches that emphasise the adaptive process and illuminate the formal, narratological, technological, industrial and cultural dimensions of transmedia adaptation. How do stories and characters, mechanics, aesthetics and meanings transform as they move between videogames and other media? How do adaptive practices acknowledge or resist these differences? What role do intellectual property, industrial consolidation and transmedia marketing play in shaping adaptive choices and audience experiences? What theoretical frameworks can help us move further beyond fidelity criticism? How can we better understand adaptation as a two-way process that reveals broader truths about media convergence, storytelling possibilities, and the evolving nature of entertainment industries? These are just a flavour of the questions this collection will address.

At this stage, we are prioritising submissions that address the following topics:

1. Histories of game adaptation — How have adaptation practices evolved from early arcade games and home console ports to contemporary transmedia franchises that start or end with games?
2. Narrative and mechanical translation — How do narrative structures, game mechanics, and interactive elements translate (or resist translation) across media?
3. Aesthetic and stylistic adaptation — What is the relationship between visual design, sound design, cinematic language, and ludic form?
4. Industrial and economic factors — How have studios, licensing agreements, and IP ownership shaped adaptive decisions?
5. Gender, representation, and adaptation — How does adaptation shape or reshape character representation, narrative arcs, and thematic content?
6. Transmedia franchises and worldbuilding — The role of adaptation in constructing interoperable fictional worlds across multiple platforms
7. Audiences and reception — How do fans, critics, and players interpret and engage with adapted works across media?

Please email a chapter abstract (300-500 words) and a brief author biography (100 words maximum) to Dr Michael Samuel (mike.samuel@bristol.ac.uk ) and Dr Richard Cole (Richard.Cole@bristol.ac.uk) by 7 August 2026. In your email, please indicate which topic/question from above that your proposed chapter will address. The book proposal is currently under consideration by Palgrave. We therefore anticipate that final chapters will be between 6,500 and 8000 words (including notes and references). All submissions must be original, previously unpublished work. Please use Harvard in-text referencing formatting for citations. Please include the subject line ‘Between Screens’ with your email.
If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us (email both of us).

Editor Bios
Dr Michael Samuel is Senior Lecturer in Digital Film and TV Studies and co-director of the Bristol Digital Game Lab at the University of Bristol.
Dr Richard Cole is Senior Lecturer in Digital Futures and co-director of the Bristol Digital Game Lab at the University of Bristol.


Last updated June 25, 2026

Saturday, November 7, 2015

CFP Essay Collection on The Hobbit in Fiction and Film (proposals by 12/1/2015)

Head's up from H-Film:

CFP: Essay Collection on The Hobbit in Fiction and Film (working title) with McFarland publisher
Discussion published by Janice Bogstad on Friday, October 2, 2015
https://networks.h-net.org/node/14467/discussions/86662/cfp-essay-collection-hobbit-fiction-and-film-working-title

COMPARING JACKSON’S The Hobbit FILMS TO TOLKIEN’s NOVEL: : Text into Film   Edited by Dr. Janice M Bogstad

 Call for papers for an essay collection -12-15 essays of 6000-8,000 words in length.

The deadline for receipt of an abstract, for consideration, is Dec 1, 2015. Final manuscripts are due March 1, 2016 with encouragement for earlier submission.  Contact me to discuss exceptions.



Send Abstracts and address queries to:  
Dr. Janice M. Bogstad, Professor    bogstajm@uwec.edu  715-836-6032
(McIntyre Library U of Wisconsin-Eau Claire   Eau Claire, WI  54702-5010

Manuscripts will be reviewed in a double-blind process by peer reviewers after having been tentatively accepted by the editor.

The collection will consider comparisons between Tolkien’s original Hobbit and the three Jackson films.  Of interest are structural parallels and differences, changes in character-focus from the book to the films, and considerations of philosophical differences in the overall message of Tolkien’s original book and Jackson’s films, but other well-supported arguments will also be considered.  As with the previously published essay collection, Picturing Tolkien (McFarland 2011), this collection will focus on positive comparisons. Essayists may wish to discuss features of the film that are, in their judgment, less successful, but will be asked to hold condemnation of the cinematic text simply on the basis of its differences from the textual narrative.  Authors may decide to focus on the films or the novel but the primary focus is comparative features of both.  Contribution to Tolkien scholarship can be articulated with two concepts:  its audience is the informed reader, not only the Tolkien, literary or film critic.  Its basic framework is in respect of co-measurability, that the books and the films are co-creations with parallel structures that intersect at certain points.  Each should be examined and compared as if those comparisons and intersections are significant to understanding contemporary Tolkien studies.

CFP History Channel's Vikings Collection (proposals 6/1/2016)

Courtesy Tim Rayborn:

New anthology on the Vikings television show

McFarland Publishers, an independent book publisher devoted to a wide variety of topics, including history, sports, and pop culture, is releasing a collection of essays on the History Channel’s television series "Vikings." I will act as editor, being a medievalist and having an interest in Northern European culture and history. I have written three books for McFarland (two available now and one published early next year), and am a professional performer of early music.

Entering its fourth season in 2016, the show has a large and growing audience of fans, though it also has detractors and critics, mainly for its tendency to take liberties with historical events and details. However, it does make use of period languages, and is known for its cinematography.

In assembling a collection of essays, I am looking for a considerable variety of topics, including history, sociology, pop culture studies, gender studies, etc. Possible subjects might include:


  • Historical vs. onscreen representations of events, people, etc. The show often mixes elements together from different accounts. The point here would not be to overly criticize the series for its departures from history, but rather to examine differences and perhaps investigate why certain changes were made.
  • Representations in the show of everyday life, such as food, drink, farming, and domestic activities.
  • A study of Ragnar’s Saga and related accounts.
  • Sexuality in the show, from both pagan and Christian perspectives.
  • How religion is portrayed in various episodes, including Ragnar’s vision of Odin in the first episode, the events at Uppsala, Floki’s “Heathen fundamentalism,” Christian imagery in France and England, scenes such as the Viking blessing of the crops in Anglo-Saxon England, and Ragnar’s “funeral” at Paris.
  • Related to the previous topic, a study of the character of Æthelstan and Anglo-Saxon monasticism in general (at Lindisfarne and elsewhere) would be welcome.
  • Representations of women in the show. Viking women such as Lagertha, Siggy, Aslaug, Porunn, Helga, as well as Saxon and French women (such as Judith and Princess Gisla) are all worthy of further study, perhaps contrasting these characters with historical information.
  • Sociological studies would be welcome, such as why the show is so popular now (the trailer for Season Four was a hit at San Diego Comic-Con 2015, and has some 850,000 views on YouTube; the show routinely has more than 4 million weekly viewers), and which themes seem to resonate with modern viewers.



The point of this anthology is to view the show for its own merits, understanding that it is a mixture of history, saga literature, fiction, and anachronism, all of which gives it its own unique flavor. Critical essays, rather than merely criticism, are what we seek. Ideally, potential contributors would want to view the upcoming Season Four (premiering in March, 2016) to include aspects of it in their articles, though there are certainly enough topics to begin work now, and to propose subjects of study.

Essays must be in English, fully cited with end notes, and bibliography, all in accordance with the current Chicago Manual of Style. The length of each contribution should be between about 5,000 and 10,000 words, unless there is a good reason that a given essay should be shorter or longer. Please use clear, concise writing.

Peer review will be conducted after the collection is submitted, currently scheduled for September 1, 2016.

Accordingly, the deadline for article submission is June 1, 2016. Submissions before that deadline are, of course, most welcome and helpful.

If contributors wish to include images not in public domain or text excerpts from copyrighted materials requiring written permission to reproduce, they will be expected to obtain such permissions on their own, and pay the required reproduction fees (if needed). McFarland cannot reimburse for this expense. I will need hard copies of each such permission. McFarland also discourages the use of quotations of dialogue from individual episodes, as well as images/screen captures, as these require additional permission/fees from the television network and can delay publication.

Potential contributors should submit a one- to two-page proposal including a potential title, a short description/abstract of the topic(s) for your essay, a brief summary of your background and qualifications, and contact information.

Please email your proposals to me at: trayborn@sbcglobal.net

Thank you for your time and interest, and I look forward to receiving and reading your proposals.


Best wishes,

Tim Rayborn

www.mcfarlandbooks.com
www.timrayborn.com